Jay Fontanini
Module 2

Session Guide

Duration 60 minutes
Format Review + Walkthrough + Live Build
10
min

Homework Review

Surface what happened with Perplexity and Shape of Meaning over the past week.

  • One win with Perplexity - something that worked better than expected
  • One loss - a question where it fell short or produced something wrong
  • What surprised you in Shape of Meaning - or what did not land
Facilitator Tip

Wins and losses are both useful. If someone hit a significant failure - bad information, an embarrassing output - use it. "That is the verification lesson from last week made real. What would have caught it?"

15
min

The AI Landscape

Walk through the landscape page together. Give participants a map that stays useful even as the tools change.

  • The taxonomy: Narrow AI vs. Foundation Models - and why the distinction matters
  • Generative vs. Agentic AI - the most important distinction on the page
  • The accountability principle: oversight does not transfer to the tool
  • The model landscape: four organizations, different philosophies, different privacy postures
  • Where Claude sits and why it is the right tool for this program
Key Moment

Pause on the agentic AI accountability callout. In regulated industries, executives will be making deployment decisions about agentic AI within 18 months. The governance question is not theoretical.

Visual Aid

Share your screen and walk through jayfontanini.com/accelerator/curriculum/module-2/ai-landscape/ together. The taxonomy diagram anchors the discussion. Participants can read the full page on their own after the session.

5
min

Show a Working Project

Before participants build, show them what done looks like. Share the AI Coaching project - the workspace where this program was built.

  • Name and description: specific, not vague
  • Instructions panel: what Claude reads before every conversation
  • Files panel: reference documents Claude always has access to
  • Conversation history: how work accumulates over time
Key Moment

The line that lands: "Every page you read in this curriculum, every session structure you are following - this is where it was built. The tool built the program that teaches the tool."

20
min

Live Build

Build a Claude Project live with the group watching. Ask participants for a real problem first - then build around what they offer.

  • Ask the room: "Who has something they are actually working on that would benefit from ongoing context?"
  • Take the first good offer and build around it in real time
  • Narrate the decisions out loud - the thinking is the lesson, not the typing
  • Demonstrate the difference: same question in a fresh conversation vs. inside the project
Facilitator Tip

If the room goes quiet, have a fallback project ready to build - something concrete enough to demonstrate the structure but simple enough to set up in five minutes. The point is showing the decisions: project name, instructions, first file upload, first real question.

Make It Real

Once the project is running, let participants drive the first few questions. Your job is to narrate why certain questions land better than others when Claude already knows the context.

10
min

Homework + Module 3 Preview

Send participants off with a clear assignment and genuine motivation to do it.

  • Build one project around a real problem before next week - not a demo, not a test
  • Follow the four steps in the Claude Projects curriculum page
  • Come to Module 3 ready to show what you built and what was different
  • Preview: Module 3 goes deeper on how to prompt for extended reasoning and long documents
Facilitator Tip

The encouragement to give: "The first project you build will not be perfect. The instructions will be too vague or too specific. That is fine - you will know what to fix after one real conversation. The goal is to start."